// vs · granola

Notabium vs Granola.

Granola got there first with the no bot desktop approach. We respect the work. Then we extended it, with shareable video recordings, bot mode for delegated meetings, and per template AI routing.

The 60 second answer

What we share

Where we differ

GranolaNotabium
Pro starting price$18/mo$8/mo yearly
Free meetings/mo25unlimited
Trial requires cardyesno
AI summary on freepartialnone (clean wedge)
Video recording + share linksnoyes (Pro)
Bot mode for unattended meetingsnoyes (Pro+)
Per template model routingnoHaiku/Sonnet/local
Local AI summary (Qwen3)noyes
BYO API keysomeall (Claude/OpenAI/Groq/etc)
Source availablenobased on Meetily (MIT)
Note taking UXbest in classsolid, less polished

Granola's biggest strength

Granola's note taking surface is genuinely the best in the category. The split view where your live notes meld with the AI generated structure is something you do not see in any other tool. If your job is to take notes during the meeting and you want a thinking partner inside the page, Granola is hard to beat.

Notabium's biggest strength

Three workflows in one library. Local notes (the Granola use case). Video recording with a shareable link (the Loom use case). Bot mode for meetings you cannot attend (the Otter Pilot use case). You pick the mode per meeting. All four tiers, including free, see the same library. That is uniquely useful for founders and freelancers who switch contexts often.

Price math

One year of Granola Pro is $216. One year of Notabium Pro yearly is $96. Same category, less than half the price, more features. The reason we can do this: AI inference runs on your machine by default, so we have very little compute cost per user. Cloud features (sharing, hosted summaries, bot mode) are metered, so heavy users pay more via credit packs.

Try Notabium for one meeting. Free, no card.
download_notabium

Related: vs Otter · vs Loom · vs Fireflies